Fat can enhance breast reconstruction results
Fat can enhance breast reconstruction results
Posted Friday, March 20, 2009
When a woman receives implants during reconstructive
surgery, she may experience some implant deformities. However,
doctors and experts find supplemental fat injections to be an
outstanding option for smoothing and reshaping the reconstructed
breast.
Last year, the American Society of Plastic Surgery was presented
with compelling evidence that fat injections are a safe and
effective way to correct implant wrinkling in a reconstructed
breast. Additionally, doctors report very high satisfaction from
patients who have undergone this procedure.
"My reconstruction patients could not be happier with the
improvement fat transfer gives to the appearance of their
breasts," study co-author Gregory Scott, MD, told colleagues at
an ASPS conference.
So does this mean fat injections should be used for purely
cosmetic breast augmentation, too? There is a great debate over
this because it is unclear just how much fat must be used, and
the side effects include possible calcification of the fat that
could be mistaken for tumors in a mammogram. There is no breast
tissue left after a mastectomy, so these concerns are
significantly lower when it comes to reconstruction.
Tags: ASPS,
breast augmentation,
breast cancer,
breast implants,
breast reconstruction, breasts,
fat injections,
fat transfer, injectable,
mammogram,
mastectomy,
reconstructive surgery, research,
study
Related: Implants
vs. fat injections
Proven peels for acne
Posted Monday, March 16, 2009
Despite years of professional and at-home use, there had
never been a study comparing alpha-hydroxy and beta-hydroxy acid
peels for the treatment of acne until this year. Not surprising
to those who've prescribed and used them, both types were found
to be highly effective.
Using 20 participants with mild to severe acne, researchers
applied a glycolic (AHA) peel to one half of their faces and a
salicylic (BHA) peel to the other half every other week for six
weeks. The vast majority of the patients experienced similar,
noticeable improvements on both sides after each treatment.
So, which type of peel is right for you? While AHA and BHA have
comparable clarifying results, you may want to consider that the
study showed more peeling and scaliness on the AHA side of the
participants' faces. Additionally, a few patients developed new
blemishes on the AHA side over the course of the study. However,
this doesn't necessarily mean you will experience these side
effects, so talk to a dermatologist about making the right choice
for your own skin.
The risk your skin and eyes share
Posted Tuesday, March 17, 2009
When you hear the word melanoma, you probably
think of skin cancer. But technically, it is cancer of melanocyte
cells, which means it can occur anywhere the body has pigment.
One of those places is the eye's iris.
Canadian researchers wanted to determine if certain skin features
can help determine a higher risk of uveal (iris) melanoma. As
suspected, fair and easily-sunburned skin, common and atypical
moles, and freckles do, in fact, reflect a greater likelihood of
developing this kind of cancer.
Because the risk of uveal melanoma decreases as pigment
increases, older caucasians with light eyes whose skin fit the
aforementioned characteristics are the most likely to become one
of approximately 2000 people who are diagnosed with this kind of
cancer in the U.S. every year.
Tags: cancer,
ethnicity,
fair
skin, freckles,
melanocytes,
melanoma,
mole,
pigment,
research,
skin cancer, study,
uveal melanoma
Related:
Why
your moles might not become melanoma
When skin is both oily and dry
Posted Tuesday, March 03, 2009 by Heather Long, Aesthetician, Mesa, Arizona
One of the top skin complaints I've consistently heard from
my clients is that their skin is "oily dry." Not knowing how to
treat the problem, their misguided choices usually made it worse.
They would usually try to control the oil with a foaming face
wash that would strip the skin's layers, consequently leaving dry
areas even flakier. Then, they would load a thick moisturizer on
top of that in an attempt to take care of the dryness, which only
trained the skin to make less oil there. It's a vicious
cycle.
So, how do you treat this partially-oily, breaking-out, dry skin?
One of the most important things to do in this situation is to
exfoliate. You're dealing with some oily skin that isn't being
properly exfoliated, so dead skin cells (those dry patches just
hanging out there) are clogging up the pores (along with extra
sebum production) and causing breakouts. Find an appropriate skin
cleanser, exfoliate (either with a scrub or hydroxy acid), and
moisturize with a product suited for your skin type.
Do this several times a week until you start to see better
results. Then, you can taper back on the exfoliation step,
keeping in mind that exfoliating should always be a weekly part
of your skincare regimen.
A procedure for smaller pores
Posted Friday, February 13, 2009
Regardless of your skin type, large, obvious pores can keep
you from looking like you have flawless skin. Originally
developed for hair removal, Isolaz is a groundbreaking painless
treatment that employs both suction and laser therapy to
thoroughly clean your pores, clearing them of dirt, sebum and
debris, and ultimately making them seem smaller.
Not only does Isolaz help to address pore size, it also fights
mild to moderate acne. The 10-minute, no-downtime-required
treatment uses a vacuum to first gently lift bacteria to the
surface before a laser light—which doesn’t cause light
sensitivity and is safe to use during pregnancy—kills the
bacteria and sloughs away dead skin cells and oil.
Your skin may feel warm directly after the treatment, but you
will see a visible difference in pore size after about four
treatments, which run about $375 each.
Tags: acne,
bacteria,
exfoliation,
Isolaz,
laser,
light,
pores,
pregnancy,
procedure,
sebum,
treatment
Related: Cleaner
pores from a reliable ritual
Click here to sign up now.
0 Comments